![]() ![]() STYLE FIFTH EDITION PDF BASICS PROFESSIONALBased on documents from many sources, including letters with Breuer and August Forel, Freud, Wilhelm Fliess, and Hugo Wolf, and personal recollections of family, friends, and clients, Hirschmüller provides a new picture of Breuer's life and work, including his family origins and home, his school and student days, his professional career, and a complete assessment of his scientific achievements. Translated from the original German edition, revised, and updated, it offers a comprehensive and engaging story of the intriguing life of one of the key figures in the history of psychoanalysis, a man whose contributions in psychoanalysis and physiology have been. "The Life and Work of Joseph Breuer" triumphantly fills that gap. Until now, there has been no biography in English of Joseph Breuer. When rewards or punishments are used in experiments a complicated mixture of classical and instrumental conditioning takes place. It discusses the human classical and operant conditioning, both the simple forms and more complex varieties that parallel in some regard the basic varieties of human learning that form the subject matter of this symposium. The chapter explains some of the further operations and functional relations that set limits to the operational classification. The two sets of subclassifications are necessarily operational and incompletely operational at that rather than functional. A tridimensional classification of operant or instrumental experiments is outlined that depends upon cues, nature of the reinforcement, and nature of the response demanded of the subject. The four subclasses involve successively less motivation from extrinsic sources and more dependence upon the conditioned stimulus (CS) and unconditioned stimulus (UCS) alone. This chapter presents a way of classifying classical conditioning experiments into four subclasses. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are addressed. Overall, the pattern of results indicates that reward contingencies do not have pervasive negative effects on intrinsic motivation. When rewards are linked to level of performance, measures of intrinsic motivation increase or do not differ from a nonrewarded control group. Negative effects are found on high-interest tasks when the rewards are tangible, expected (offered beforehand), and loosely tied to level of performance. On high-interest tasks, verbal rewards produce positive effects on free-choice motivation and self-reported task interest. Rewards given for low-interest tasks enhance free-choice intrinsic motivation. Our results suggest that in general, rewards are not harmful to motivation to perform a task. The purpose of the present article is to resolve differences in previous meta-analytic findings and to provide a meta-analysis of rewards and intrinsic motivation that permits tests of competing theoretical explanations. A more recent meta-analysis of the literature by Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999) shows pervasive negative effects of reward. In 1994, Cameron and Pierce conducted a meta-analysis of this literature and concluded that negative effects of reward were limited and could be easily prevented in applied settings. Over the past 30 years, more than 100 experimental studies have been conducted on this topic. A major concern in psychology and education is that rewards decrease intrinsic motivation to perform activities. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |